All About



Saturday, February 9, 2013

Higher Payroll Tax Pinches Those With Least to Spare

Jack Andrews and his wife no longer enjoy what they call date night, their once-a-month outing to the movies and a steak dinner at Logan’s Roadhouse in Augusta, Ga. In Harlem, Eddie Phillips’s life insurance payment will have to wait a few more weeks. And Jessica Price is buying cheaper food near her home in Orlando, Fla., even though she worries it may not be as healthy.
Like millions of other Americans, they are feeling the bite from the sharp increase in payroll taxes that took effect at the beginning of January. There are growing signs that the broader economy is suffering, too.
Chain-store sales have weakened over the course of the month. And two surveys released last week suggested that consumer confidence was eroding, especially among lower-income Americans.
While these data points are preliminary — more detailed statistics on retail sales and other trends will not be available until later this month — at street level, the pain from the expiration of a two-percentage-point break in Social Security taxes in 2011 and 2012 is plain to see.
“You got to stretch what you got,” said Mr. Phillips, 51, a front-desk clerk and maintenance man for a nonprofit housing group who earned $22,000 last year. “That little $20 or $30 affects you, especially if you’re just making enough money to stay above water.” So he has taken to juggling bills, skipping a payment on one this month and another next month.
“I’m playing catch-up each month,” he said. “You go to the supermarket and you can’t spend what you used to.”
Jack Andrews has it slightly better than Mr. Phillips. He earns a bit more than $40,000 a year manufacturing ceramics in a local factory, but because his wife, Cindy, is disabled, he is the sole breadwinner. Something had to give now that he is earning about $800 less a year, or $66 a month, and it was the couple’s monthly night out.
“It’s just gotten out of reach,” Mr. Andrews said.
The tax break, which was pushed by the White House to stimulate spending in 2011 and extended in 2012, was always supposed to be temporary. But with pressure building in Washington to reduce the deficit and politicians fighting bitterly over whether to raise taxes on the very rich, the question of how the increase in Social Security taxes would affect the poorest workers did not seem to garner much debate on either side of the aisle.
“I don’t see any reason to consider supporting its extension,” said Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, in testimony last year. Even Nancy Pelosi, a reliable liberal who leads the Democratic minority in the House of Representatives, was for letting it expire.
The higher rate applies to all earned income up to $113,700. For a household earning $100,000 a year, the two-percentage-point increase means an additional $2,000 a year in payroll deductions. Economists estimate that the payroll tax increase will reduce disposable income by about $120 billion and shave half a percentage point from economic growth in the first quarter — a significant blow given that the economy is expected to expand only 1 to 2 percent in the first half of 2013.
“If you wanted to design a policy to squeeze the spending of lower- and middle-income households, raising the payroll tax is the way to do it,” said Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomic Advisors. “It’s very regressive.”
Retailing analysts and economists say high-end earners will largely be spared.
“I wouldn’t expect it to have much of an effect on BMW consumption,” said Richard H. Thaler, a professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. “The people who will notice it the most are the ones making the least.”
In Medford, Ore., Darchelle Skipwith had to scrap her monthly budget and start over when the law changed.
She is buying less meat; driving less often to see her sister, who lives 12 miles away in Eagle Point; and putting less away in savings. In August, Ms. Skipwith, 42, hopes to get a raise of 50 cents an hour at her job stacking shelves at Walmart, which should help make up the difference.
For now, she has no choice but to change her daily routine.
“I added it up — it’s about $75 a month,” Ms. Skipwith said. “That’s not a lot for some people, but mine is the only paycheck. I don’t have extra money coming in.”
Of course, taxes are going up on wealthier Americans, too, with a rise in marginal rates on income above $400,000 for individuals and higher taxes on capital gains and dividends. But millions of individual decisions by poorer Americans in Medford, Augusta, Harlem and elsewhere are quickly adding up.
Monthly data for chain-store sales in January will not be released until later this week, but the weekly data already available for last month showed a steady deterioration in shopping activity.
“There is something going on,” said Chris G. Christopher Jr., senior principal economist at IHS Global Insight. “The payroll tax seems to be cutting into things.”
That pattern was apparent in a Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan survey of consumer sentiment released on Friday, according to Richard T. Curtin, who directs surveys of consumers at the university.
When asked how their financial situation had changed in January, 32 percent of people with incomes below $75,000 said their pay had dropped, compared with 13 percent who said it had increased. By contrast, 38 percent of people earning more than $75,000 said their wages had gone up last month, and 23 percent said they had gone down.
“We rarely see such divergent trends,” Dr. Curtin said. “Mostly it was the payroll tax hurting the lower incomes, while higher-income folks had a boost from things like dividends.”
In fact, as companies paid out dividends to shareholders early to avoid the higher tax rate for 2013, personal dividend income increased at a seasonally adjusted monthly rate of 34.3 percent in December, compared with a 4.5 percent rise in November.
But that did little to help Jessica Price, who holds down two jobs in Orlando. Most weekends she works at a clothing store in a shopping center near the Universal Studios theme park, within sight of the roller coasters, and she spends weekdays collecting tolls on a local expressway.
Ms. Price, 20, whose annual income is $15,000 to $16,000, prefers shopping at Whole Foods, the upscale supermarket chain, which is healthier but more expensive. But since the payroll tax went up, she has been going more often to Publix and Walmart.
“The food that has a lot of fat and food coloring is cheaper,” she said. “It’s a lot more expensive to eat healthier. But now I’m actually looking at the price tag on things rather than grabbing them.”

Gisele Bundchen Debuts 2-Month-Old Daughter Vivian Lake


Gisele and her mini-me, Vivian. (Facebook)Two months after she entered the world, Gisele Bundchen and Tom Brady’s daughter Vivian Lake has finally made her debut … and, of course, she’s as cute as we assumed she’d be. On Friday morning, the Brazilian supermodel posted this sweet photo on her Facebook page, writing, "Love is everything!!! Happy friday, much love to all."
The mother-daughter duo are currently in Hawaii for a family vacation now that the NFL season is over. The brood, which also includes 3-year-old son Benjamin, touched down in the tropical paradise on Thursday. And as they de-boarded their private jet, Bundchen carried off her most precious cargo: her infant daughter, dressed in a girly pink-and-white hooded sweater and pink pants.


Gisele and Vivian. (Splash News)Tom and Benjamin. (Splash News)Brady, meanwhile, handled the actual luggage – including Benjamin’s adorable monkey backpack – as he and what looked like a nanny escorted the little guy towards a group of Hawaiian locals waiting to welcome the family with floral leis and a strand of black beads for the New England Patriots quarterback.
As sure as we were that Vivian would be a cutie, we also assumed the Victoria’s Secret supermodel’s body would bounce back with the greatest of ease. And on Thursday, she looked to have lost every ounce of the weight she had gained before delivering Vivian on December 5.
Two days after the home birth, Bundchen, 32, announced their happy news on her Facebook page, along with a close-up shot of the newborn’s hand in hers.
“We feel so lucky to have been able to experience the miracle of birth once again and are forever grateful for the opportunity to be the parents of another little angel,” she wrote. “Vivian Lake was born at home on December 5. She is healthy and full of life. Thank you all for your support and well wishes. We wish you and your families many blessings.”
If Bundchen has her way, there will also be more blessings for her and Brady, 35.
“I want to have lots of children," she told Britain's Hello! Magazine in 2010. "It doesn't matter if my body changes. It is the most marvelous thing. For example, they sometimes say that your breasts begin to sag, but I couldn't care less."

Barbie’s packing up, leaving Malibu, selling Dreamhouse for $25 million

here is perhaps the most bizarre property listing you'll ever come across:
Barbie's Dreamhouse is listed on Trulia for $25 million.
That's right. The pink plastic one. The one that isn't real*.
Stories like this are always tricky to report. It's a naked gambit by Mattel for publicity, of course, which probably ought to make it an automatic "ignore." (And darn it, the listing isn't on the Yahoo!-Zillow Real Estate Network, either. Boooo.) But at the same time it's a little, well, irresistible ... right? We're assuming some part of you must agree if you're reading this.
So we're succumbing to temptation.
The story goes that Barbie has lived in Malibu, Calif., for more than 40 years, but she's ready for a change. She says she's open to "all seven continents" and is eager to try out her skills with "over 37 languages" she's picked up in her lifetime. And she doesn't require anything beyond the "basics" -- including "a never-ending closet, transforming furniture, a Glitterizer ... " (How do we know this? We watched Barbie's video interview about the impending move, of course!)
One of the photos from the property listing. Click this photo or the one at the top to go to see more images from the listing in a slideshow.One of the photos from the property listing. Click this photo or the one at the top to go to see more images from …She has hired celebrity Realtor Josh Altman, star of Bravo TV's "Million-Dollar Listing," who's marketing it as "the ultimate bachelorette compound" with "clean lines, sparkly surfaces, dazzling details, and soaring ceilings" -- an "innovatively scaled" home with three stories, 8,500 square feet and a single bedroom. (Click here or on either photo above to go to a slideshow of photos from the property listing.)
The listing says it's "the only house in Malibu with a truly unobstructed view of the ocean (after all, it only has three walls)" as well as "a self-flushing toilet and fireplace that crackles even when it's not on." It also features "voluminous 119-centimeter ceilings, pink crown molding, custom Pantone® 219C hardwood floors" and a "pink Poliform kitchen ... complete with pink granite countertops."

In other media materials, Altman tells a prospective buyer about the amenities: "Let's just put it this way: Have you ever seen a pink elevator on a pulley system? ... The pink car and the pink boat? Those items are sold separately."
(In real life, Altman does have actual L.A.-area listings: 6698 Whitley Terrace for $899,000, 3549 N. Knoll Drive for $2.4 million, 1642 N. Crescent Heights Blvd. for $1.6 million and 1301 Sunset Plaza Drive for just shy of $2 million.)
It's the kickoff of a yearlong brand campaign, and we have to admit, we found ourselves getting immersed in the narrative in spite of ourselves. As Stephanie Cota, a Mattel senior vice president for global marketing, puts it: "People really want to know what's going on in her life." Given Barbie's 7 million-strong Facebook following, we're not inclined to argue.
If it's true that 90 percent of girls age 3 to 10 own at least one Barbie, and that the average number owned by girls 3 to 6 is a dozen, as Mattel says, then it's not hard to imagine the campaign picking up steam.
The 1979 Dreamhouse. Click the photo for a slideshow of designs through the decades.

The 1979 Dreamhouse. Click the photo for a slideshow of designs through the decades.And with savvy details like Barbie's enlistment of a "Dream Team of interior designers [including] Los Angeles-based textile designer and design influencer Lulu Dekwiatkowski, New York/Palm Beach based designer Celerie Kemble and West Coast fashion and home product designer Trina Turk" -- as the news release reports -- then there's a pretty decent chance that grown-ups will, like us, grow guiltily curious, too.
We can't help but wonder where she'll ultimately settle and -- more significant for Mattel -- we're pretty interested to see the design of the new Dreamhouse, which is set to go on sale in toy stores around Christmas. Is it possible that the new model will be less of a monstrous confection?
Please, Lulu and Celerie and Trina, make it be so!
Tell us in the comments: Where do you think Barbie should move to? And what should a Dreamhouse look like in 2013? (We've also put together a slideshow of Barbie Dreamhouse designs through the decades; click here or on the 1979 photo to take a look.)
*Note: Just to be crystal-clear, nothing is really for sale. Although real people and businesses like Trulia are participating in Mattel's branding campaign, the narrative is entirely fictional. However, Mattel really will be releasing a new Dreamhouse design in toy stores for the holidays this year, and as far as we can tell, it truly is taking design input from real-life designers. (According to the news release, Barbie is "partnering with a group of admired style setters, designers and industry experts to re-imagine the Barbie Dreamhouse for today.") And to make things even more meta/confusing, Mattel will be building full-size Barbie Dreamhouses worldwide for fans to walk through in a "Dreamhouse Experience"; the first ones will open in Florida and Berlin this month.
If you want to read even more about the Barbie Dreamhouse -- and we wouldn't blame or judge you for it -- the New York Times has an interesting article about the branding campaign. Plus, a few months ago, our friends at Curbed wrote an interesting post about the controversial Architect Barbie; Curbed has also written a fun post about the current Dreamhouse campaign.

Sonos Play:3 wireless speaker review

Sonos Play:3
A Lower-Cost Entry Into the Best Wireless Speaker Ecosystem
Rating: 8/10 Excellent, with room to kvetch.
$300 on Yahoo! Shopping
When it comes to multi-room wireless music systems, Sonos has been one of the go-to choices for years now. Even with the proliferation of wireless AirPlay and Bluetooth speakers, no other system has been able to match the company’s unique combination of simplicity and sound quality. If there was anything holding the Sonos back, it’s been the fairly steep price of admission. After all, a Play:5 speaker plus the requisite wireless Bridge meant you were paying a minimum of $450.
The good news is that the Play:3 lowers that cost of entry by about $100. The great news is that it does so without cutting any discernible sonic corners. Yes, it’s smaller than its older sibling. And yes, you’ll lose two drivers and a wee bit of clarity in the mid and upper ranges. But when it comes to the things Sonos is really known for — the trademark ease of setup and lush, room-filling sound — this smaller speaker does not disappoint.
In fact, the Play:3 even knows a few tricks its big brother doesn’t. Thanks to an onboard accelerometer, the speaker can sense whether it’s placed vertically or horizontally and can subsequently auto-correct from stereo to mono. This means you get even more flexibility, and can slip one into a bookshelf or group two together in the same room to create a formidable stereo pair. While it lacks the sonic clarity of bigger wireless units I’ve tested, its lower price is truly cause for elation for anyone wanting a no-fuss entry point into a home full of music.
WIRED Easiest setup of any wireless speaker system. Quarter-inch 20-thread socket for easy wall mounting. Streams not only your library, but also nearly every audio service known to man, including whatever’s stored on your phone. Sonos makes one of the best (if not the best) remote apps for controlling your music.
TIRED Unlike the Play:5, no standard inputs. Requires the $50 Sonos Bridge or a direct Ethernet connection to your router. Bass could be more refined.

Unique Valentine's Day gifts for him & her, all under $25

Swiss Army Knife
Thinking up original Valentine's Day gifts can be a challenge—especially when you've got a strict budget to stick to.
But even if diamonds, extravagant dinners or hundred-dollar lingerie are out of the question, fret not—it's often the smaller, super-thoughtful gifts that make the largest impact anyway.
Here are Valentine's Day gifts for both genders that are sure to delight—and that'll keep your wallet happy, too.
FOR HIM
This handy-dandy present shows that you think of your guy as the ultimate MacGyver—and that subtle pattern barely even seems Valentine's Day-inspired.
Victorinox Swiss Army "Electro love" knife, $24, swissarmy.com
Mignon memory ring in sterling silver
         
 

 








FOR HER
Delicate upper-finger rings like this one are right in line with the current minimalism trend—they're chic, comfortable to wear and shockingly affordable.
Mignon memory ring in sterling silver, $20, catbirdnyc.com
(Photo courtesy of crateandbarrel.com)   


Medium slate cheese board















FOR HIM
A sophisticated serving tray both of you can enjoy—whether you're entertaining with a group or having a wine and cheese party for two. Use chalk for labeling purposes, or just to write some silly messages.
Medium slate cheese board, $19.95, crateandbarrel.com

Virtue anamorphic cup and saucer by Damien Hirst














 

FOR HER
Damien Hirst's butterfly mosaics are incredibly beautiful. Bet you never thought you could own a piece of Hirst's work for less than $25!
Virtue anamorphic cup and saucer by Damien Hirst, $23.72, shop.tate.org.uk


Facial fuel no-shine moisturizing lip balm













FOR HIM
The ultimate manly-man lip balm, this is super-moisturizing but doesn't appear glossy. What better way to initiate a kiss?
Facial fuel no-shine moisturizing lip balm, $9, kiehls.com

Rad nails "foil back to basics"










FOR HER
For the perfect ruby red Valentine's Day manicure that's not at all gimmicky.
Rad nails "foil back to basics" set in shiny red foil, $20, radnails.com


Saddle leather earphone case













FOR HIM
If your Valentine's a music maven, he'll love this monogrammed holder for his favorite earbuds—it'll feel personal and keep those cords from tangling.

Ruffle bralette

Saddle leather earphone case, $15.50 (or $22.50 with monogramming), potterybarn.com











FOR HER
Classic push-up styles are great and all—but when it comes to sexy comfort, there's nothing like a pretty little bralette.
Ruffle bralette, $20, honeydew intimates, shopbop.com
Bacon sea salt









































What dude doesn't go crazy for cured meats?
Bacon sea salt, $8.95 for 2 oz or $16.95 for 4 oz, thefillingstationnyc.com
Handcuff "Ditsy" bracelet