Rarely has the government sent so many conflicting signals in so short a time about the bottom line for the health care industry.
Cuts are coming, says Washington, and some could be really big. Yet more government spending is also being promised as President Barack Obama's health care overhaul advances and millions of uninsured people move closer to getting government-subsidized coverage.
"Imagine a person being told they
are going to get a raise, but their taxes are also going to go up and
they are going to be paying more for gas," said Thornton Kirby,
president of the South Carolina Hospital Association. "They don't know
if they are going to be taking home more or less. That's the uncertainty
when there are so many variables in play."
Real money is at stake for big hospitals and small medical practices
alike. Government at all levels pays nearly half the nation's health
care tab, with federal funds accounting for most of that.
It's widely assumed that a budget deal
will mean cuts for Medicare service providers. But which ones? How
much? And will Medicaid and subsidies to help people get coverage under
the health care law also be cut?
As House Speaker John Boehner famously said: "God only knows." The
Ohio Republican was referring to the overall chances of getting a budget
deal, but the same can be said of how health care — one-sixth of the
economy — will fare.
"There is no political consensus to do anything significant," said Dan Mendelson, president of Avalere Health, a market analysis firm. "There is a collective walking away from things that matter. All the stuff on the lists of options becomes impossible, because there is no give-and-take."
As if things weren't complicated
enough, doctors keep facing their own recurring fiscal cliff, separate
from the bigger budget battle but embroiled in it nonetheless.
Come Jan. 1, doctors and certain
other medical professionals face a 26.5 percent cut in their Medicare
payments, the consequence of a 1990s deficit-reduction law gone awry.
Lawmakers failed to repeal or replace that law even after it became
obvious that it wasn't working. Instead, Congress usually passes a "doc
fix" each year to waive the cuts.
This year, the fix got hung up in larger budget politics. Although a
reprieve is expected sooner or later, doctors don't like being told to
sit in the congressional waiting room.
"It seems like there is a presumption that physicians and patients can basically tolerate this kind of uncertainty while the Congress goes through whatever political machinations they are going through," said Dr. Jeremy Lazarus, president of the American Medical Association. "Our concern is that physician uncertainty and anxiety about being able to pay the bills will have an impact on taking care of patients."
A recent government survey indicates that Medicare beneficiaries are having more problems when trying to find a new primary care doctor, and Lazarus said that will only get worse.
Adding to their unease, doctors
also face an additional reduction if automatic spending cuts go through.
Those would be triggered if Obama and congressional leaders are unable
to bridge partisan differences and strike a deal. They are part of the
combination of tax increases and spending cuts dubbed the "fiscal
cliff."
Medicare service providers would
get hit with a 2 percent across-the-board cut, but Medicaid and
subsidies for the uninsured under Obama's health care overhaul would be
spared. The Medicare cut adds up to about $120 billion over ten years,
with 40 percent falling on hospitals, according to Avalare's analysis.
Nursing homes, Medicare Advantage plans and home health agencies also
get hit.
The American Hospital Association says that would lead to the loss of
hundreds of thousands of hospital jobs in a labor intensive industry
that also generates employment for other businesses in local
communities.
"It's very difficult to believe
hospitals can absorb the kinds of numbers they are talking about without
reducing service or workforce," said Kirby, the hospital association
head. "You may decide that a service a hospital provides is not
affordable — for example, obstetrics in a rural community — if you're
making a little bit of money or losing a little bit of money by
continuing to deliver babies in a rural community."
Independent analysts like Mendelson doubt that a 2 percent Medicare cut to hospitals would be catastrophic, but say it will cost jobs somewhere.
Even if there is a budget deal, the squeeze will be on.
The administration has proposed
$400 billion in health care cuts so far in the budget talks, coming
mainly from Medicare spending. That's only a starting point as far as
Republicans are concerned. They also want to pare back Medicaid and
Obama's health care law, and have also sought an increase in the
eligibility age for Medicare.
No comments:
Post a Comment