NEW YORK (Reuters) -
Not so long ago, fracking was a technical term little known beyond the
energy industry. Now it's coming to Hollywood, as the fierce battle
between environmentalists and oil firms is played out in several
forthcoming films.
Hydraulic
fracturing, the controversial drilling technique also known as fracking,
has lifted U.S. energy output dramatically, despite warnings from
critics who fear it pollutes water deep underground.
Any shift in public
opinion could impact policy - and huge sums in energy spending - since
drilling regulations are under review by the Obama administration and
local officials around the country. The high stakes involve a range of
issues from U.S. energy independence, to protection of drinking water.
Both sides are using movies to try to win the debate, though actor Matt Damon says viewers should not assume the movie he stars in, "Promised Land," is "a rabid anti-fracking polemic."
In the film, Damon plays a gas company landman - an
agent who buys or leases land - intent on drilling beneath a town where
some residents are concerned about the perils of fracking. As the
landman gets to know the townspeople, he suffers a crisis of conscience.In an interview in Los Angeles, Damon said he worries that viewers will wrongly assume the film is one-sided and not see it. He declined to offer his personal view on fracking. "That's not the point. The point is that (the film) should start a conversation."
The Northern Irish
director Phelim McAleer's documentary, "FrackNation," is an unabashedly
pro-drilling mantra set to air next month on AXS TV, the cable network
controlled by Dallas Mavericks owner and media mogul Mark Cuban.
McAleer views fracking as "the best thing ever," a
potential savior for the U.S. economy, unless the forces he likes to
call "Big Enviro" succeed in derailing it.
On the other side
of the argument, HBO, the cable pay channel, could air a sequel to
"Gasland," a scathing 2010 documentary from director Josh Fox, as early as next year.
The original film
featured scenes of tap water erupting into flames and mobilized
environmental groups against fracking, drawing full-throated rebuttals
from an oil industry that says the process has never caused water problems.
Fox declined comment for this article.Amid the showdown, both industry and anti-fracking camps have mounted major campaigns to sway hearts and minds.
"It could become
the biggest environmental debate of our time," said Robert McNally, an
energy policy expert and former White House adviser under George W. Bush. "Hollywood is taking notice, and the industry will have its work cut out for it to defend fracking."
Nearly four out of ten Americans surveyed by the Pew
Research Center early this year said they knew nothing about fracking.
Other polls show most Americans familiar with the practice believe
fracking offers economic benefits but requires tougher regulation.
This year, for the
first time, U.S. online searches for the term "fracking" became more
popular than "climate change," Google data showed. Fracking has doubled on Google's popularity index since last year, and while "global warming" still draws more hits, the gap is narrowing.
Drinking water contamination is the leading
environmental concern among Americans, according to Gallup polling data.
A Bloomberg National Poll this month showed that 66 percent of
Americans want more fracking regulation, up from 56 percent in
September.'POUNDING THE ZONE'
Whether "Promised Land" will shift public opinion is uncertain. But films with environmental themes often can, according to Joseph Cappella, a professor of communications at the University of Pennsylvania.
Past examples
include Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" on climate change, and "Erin
Brockovich," a dramatization of real events in which actress Julia
Roberts played a legal clerk who uncovers water contamination by a California power company.
Ahead of the release of "Promised Land," some within the oil industry are already reading the film's script online.
"Look, I don't want
to whistle past the graveyard. This film is going to be a challenge,
and we'll just have to see how it does on opening weekend," said Chris Tucker
of pro-drilling group Energy In Depth (EID), which is funded by
industry. "In terms of popularization of the issue, it will have an
effect."
The oil industry wants to avoid another blow like the one it took from Fox's 2010 "Gasland" film. Google search data shows online interest in fracking surged immediately afterwards.
For three years,
Tucker has been working with other communications experts, "pounding the
zone with facts" to counter what he calls false claims in "Gasland" and
to promote drilling.
Films like
"Promised Land" will get people curious and send them searching online,
said Tucker, where he worries the term 'fracking' gets a bad rap.
"People will go home and Google it, and the other side does really well on Google," he said.
EID released its own pro-drilling film, "Truthland," this year, dubbing it "the factual alternative to Gasland."
LOSING PR BATTLE?
In some ways, the
film blitz may be behind the times. Fracking has already come to
dominate U.S. drilling over the last half-decade: Onshore rigs doing
so-called unconventional drilling account for nearly two-thirds of the
total.
Tucker and industry
officials are regulars at conferences, in newspaper op-ed articles, and
on TV to defend drilling.
On the environmentalist side, Fox travels widely to
lead anti-fracking rallies, sometimes rousing crowds by playing a banjo,
which is also featured in the Gasland soundtrack. He has enlisted help
from artists including Yoko Ono and Sean Lennon."The lesson of 'Gasland' is that public perception is a very big part of the equation," said Jonathan Wood, a political risk analyst at London-based Control Risks, whose clients include oil companies.
In a report this
month, Wood wrote that the industry has "largely failed to appreciate
social and political risks, and has repeatedly been caught off guard by
the sophistication, speed and influence of anti-fracking activists."
Hydraulic fracturing entails pumping water laced with
chemicals and sand at high pressure into shale rock formations to break
them up and unleash hydrocarbons.
The minerals are
trapped thousands of feet below water tables, but critics worry that
fracking fluids or hydrocarbons can still leak into water tables from
wells, or above ground. Among their other concerns: fracking-related
earthquakes, and growing dependence on fossil fuels.
The United States
now rivals Russia as the world's top gas producer, in large part due to
fracking, and has stemmed a long decline in oil output, which stands at
an 18-year high near 7 million barrels a day.
So far, the Obama
administration has cautiously endorsed the new drilling, but the U.S.
Department of Interior is working on new fracking rules on public lands
starting next year.
Some drillers have faced fracking-related fines for water contamination
due to spilled fracking fluid. Last year, after sampling water in rural
Pavillion, Wyoming, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) presented
the first-ever U.S. government finding of a potential link between
fracking and water contamination.
More broadly, however, the EPA condones fracking on
safety grounds. But unlike the growing consensus among climate
scientists linking global warming and industrial activity, there is no
consensus that fracking poses a danger. Unconventional drilling has
surged only over the last half decade.The EPA will release an in-depth study on fracking's potential impacts on water supplies in 2014.
Tough economic
times can widen support for drilling. A national Gallup poll this year
showed that more Americans favored prioritizing economic growth over the
protection of the environment (49 percent versus 41 percent).
That's a reversal from 2007, when 55 percent favored environmental protection.
Cuban is betting the hot potato issue will draw viewers to "FrackNation" on his cable channel.
"Op-Ed-umentaries
like this are supposed to make people think about the topic, which is
always a good thing," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment