Correction: A previous version of this story misstated the state Sen. Mary Landrieu represents. It is Louisiana.
President Obama’s call for Congress
to show the “courage” to consider new gun-control laws was aimed at
Republicans, but he faces challenges with members of his own party who
have a history of cowering from the gun debate.
The shooting deaths of 20
children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school last week
exposed how divided Democrats have been on gun control.
It also demonstrated that, along with the current president, Democrats
have failed to champion reforms after previous acts of mass violence.
While Republicans held the line on gun control, Democrats largely ducked, ever since they ratified the assault-weapons ban in 1994 and saw their majority in Congress disappear.
Gun-control advocates face
familiar challenges in keeping Democrats unified. The most vulnerable
Democratic senators in 2014 hail from rural states where hunting is
popular and guns are ubiquitous: Mark Begich of Alaska, Mary Landrieu of
Louisiana, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Max
Baucus of Montana, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, and Jay Rockefeller of
West Virginia. (Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who was staunchly pro-gun
during his 2010 and 2012 campaigns but now says he’s open to a debate,
is not up for reelection for another six years. Same with Joe Donnelly
of Indiana, who is also reconsidering his opposition to gun control as he transitions from congressman to senator and doesn’t face another election until 2018.)
The evolutions underscore how polarized the country is over gun control.
Republicans, many of whom hail from rural, gun-owning states and
districts, and the smaller number of Democrats that represent
like-minded parts of the country, are responding as much to their
constituents as to the powerful National Rifle Association lobby when
opposing measures that come before Congress.
“There’s no question that the leadership of the party made a
conscious decision years ago to walk away from the issue at all levels,”
said Democratic lobbyist Steve Elmendorf, a top Capitol Hill adviser
when the assault-weapons ban passed. “They figured they weren’t getting
any credit for it, and they were getting hurt. I do think the situation
[in Connecticut] could change that.”
The changing political calculus for some Democrats on gun control is starkly exemplified by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who recently boasted that he “stood by [Bill] Clinton’s side”
as a top adviser when he signed the 1994 assault-weapons ban. But
years later, Emanuel helped elect numerous pro-gun candidates--and
bragged about their Second Amendment bona fides--as he spearheaded the
Democratic takeover of Congress in 2006. He was President Obama’s
chief of staff in 2010 when the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
handed the administration an “F” for expanding gun rights and failing to
reinstate the assault-weapons ban. Now, in the wake of the tragedy in
Newtown, as the mayor of a city plagued by gun violence, Emanuel is touting the ban once again.
Another prominent Democrat, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
of New York, underwent an even more dramatic conversion. As a member of
the House representing a Republican-leaning upstate district in 2008,
she voted to repeal a law that banned semiautomatic weapons in the
District of Columbia and required gun owners to register their weapons
and store them unloaded, with trigger locks. She earned an “A” rating
from the NRA. Even as gun-control advocates complained about her January
2009 appointment to the Senate, she told a newspaper reporter
that she kept two rifles under her bed. “If I want to protect my
family, if I want to have a weapon in the home, that should be my
right,” she said.
The makeover of the congresswoman
from a conservative district to the senator of a liberal state began
the next day, when staff said that the rifles were removed. Later that
year, with the help of two former critics--New York Mayor Michael
Bloomberg and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y.--she sponsored legislation
to crack down on illegal gun trafficking. The NRA downgraded her to an
“F.” “She sounded like Annie Oakley, and now she’s somebody different,”
complained her Republican challenger in 2010. Days after the shootings
in Connecticut, she wrote a newspaper column pushing her gun-trafficking bill and other restrictions. “Congress has ducked a serious national debate over commonsense gun laws for too long,” she wrote.
In the column, she describes
meeting the parents of a slain 17-year-old in Brooklyn, N.Y., shortly
after her Senate appointment and the near-shooting death of her friend,
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords,
D-Ariz., in 2011. “Her former congressional district did not experience
the same issues of gun violence,” explained her spokesman, Glen Caplin.
“For the last four years, as a statewide representative, Senator
Gillibrand has been highly focused on solving the problems of the entire
state, including gang and gun violence.”
Asked if she still owned the two rifles, Caplin said, “I’m not going to get into this.”A shift in public opinion could offer political cover. A new Pew Research Center poll finds that, by 49 percent to 42 percent, limiting gun ownership is viewed as more important than protecting gun owners. The survey marks the first time since Obama’s election that more Americans prioritized gun control over gun rights.
“We’re getting so many calls from
state capitals and Capitol Hill, it’s overwhelming,” said Brian Malte,
spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “This feels
like it could be a tipping point.”
It’s been nearly two decades since President Clinton
pushed the assault-weapons ban, strategically attached to a sweeping
anticrime bill and a 10-year expiration date. The House passed it by
only two votes, and even Democrats who voted no feared it would brand
their party as antigun.
“We knew it was a politically
devastating vote at the moment it passed,” said Patrick Griffin, who
served as Clinton’s director of legislative affairs. “They cleaned our
clock in 1994. You can’t ascribe all of that to guns, but it was a
factor.”
Guns were blamed again in 2000
when Democratic nominee Al Gore lost one of the closest presidential
elections in history to Republican George W. Bush. As vice president,
Gore backed the assault-weapons ban and cast a tie-breaking vote for a
1999 background check law. Just one more gun-friendly, Southern
state--Arkansas, West Virginia, or even his home state of
Tennessee--could have delivered the presidency to Gore, even without
Florida.
Six years later, a handful of
pro-gun candidates, including Joe Donnelly and Brad Ellsworth of
Indiana, Heath Shuler of North Carolina, and Jason Altmire of
Pennsylvania, helped Democrats take back the House. Once again, other
factors contributed to the election results--the heated immigration
debate, political scandals, and the unpopularity of the war in Iraq--but
the success of pro-gun Democrats reinforced the party’s wariness of gun
limits.
Anxious to protect their moderate
members and the president’s reelection prospects, Democrats shied from
high-stakes gun votes even after massacres at Virginia Tech and Fort
Hood (although Republicans seized the House anyway in 2010), and after
slayings at a meet-and-greet hosted by Rep. Giffords and in a movie
theater in Aurora, Colo. “It’s never been a simple Democrat versus
Republican issue. It’s much more complicated than that,” Griffin said.
A former top aide to Obama and on
Capitol Hill, Jim Papa, said that Republicans beholden to the gun lobby
deserve the lion’s share of the blame for inaction on gun control.
“There has always been an overwhelming amount of Democratic votes for gun control and practically zero support from the other party, and the responsibility falls on the Democrats?” he asked. “Opponents of gun control
have confused the issue, confused assault weapons with hunting rifles,
so there is peril for people who believe in one and not the other. The
NRA successfully equated sensible, popular gun-safety legislation with
taking away your shotgun.”
But even when Democrats
controlled both legislative chambers during Obama’s first two years in
office, they passed and he signed laws allowing visitors to carry
loaded, concealed guns to national parks and permitting Amtrak
passengers to stow guns in checked baggage. The assault-weapons ban was
never taken up during Obama’s first term, which was consumed with trying
to revive the economy, pass health care reforms, and end the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan.
“You don’t have an infinite
amount of time and goodwill, and you have to pick some priorities,” said
Griffin, the former Clinton aide. “Postelection, after this horrific
event, maybe there’s a moment when we can come to common ground. I’m
not convinced of that, but it looks better than ever.”
No comments:
Post a Comment